Why doesn’t AI speak in my language (dialect)? is an experimental project exploring the linguistic diversity in AI-driven conversations. Despite the growing presence of AI in daily life, dialects and minority languages remain underrepresented in speech recognition and text-to-speech technologies. This study investigates how well AI can handle dialect-based conversations and whether dialectal AI fosters a stronger sense of cultural identity and emotional connection for users.
The project utilized a prototype called ‘Hey’, an AI-powered system designed to engage users in dialect-based conversations. The experiment involved four participants from Korea and Italy, each speaking distinct regional dialects. Through interactive dialogue and a workshop discussion, the study examined how AI-generated dialect responses affected user engagement, trust, and intimacy in human-AI communication.
Personal Project
My role: C#, Unity Developer
Tools
Unity – Designed the prototype interface for the AI conversation system.
OpenAI Whisper – Used for Speech-to-Text (STT) processing to convert dialect speech into text.
ChatGPT (via OpenAI API) – Handled text-based responses with real-time prompt engineering.
ElevenLabs – Implemented Text-to-Speech (TTS) for AI-generated spoken dialect responses.
Custom Prompt Engineering – Tailored AI responses to match dialectal tones and expressions.
Experiment Design & Results
Step 1: Individual Conversation – Each participant engaged in a casual conversation with the AI in their dialect, selecting from five topics: hobbies, dreams, travel, food, and childhood.
Step 2: Workshop Discussion – Participants gathered to share their experiences and evaluate the AI’s dialect comprehension, response accuracy, and emotional impact.
Dialect-Based AI Created Shared Context – Participants felt a deeper connection when AI responded in their regional dialects. One Korean participant remarked, “Did you go there too?” when AI recalled a childhood-related place in dialect.
TTS Sound Quality Varied – Italian participants found AI-generated speech more natural than Korean participants, who felt it sounded artificial and exaggerated regional stereotypes.
Unnatural Sentence Structure – AI responses often adjusted only the sentence endings, which felt unnatural to native dialect speakers.
Increased Familiarity with Dialectal AI – Despite its imperfections, all participants felt dialectal AI was more engaging and personal than standardized AI, making it preferable for casual conversations over formal queries.